Posted on October 31, 2016 by beenasarwar
London Declaration for Pluralism and Democracy in Pakistan
October 29, 2016
Several prominent liberal, progressive and nationalist intellectuals, human rights and social media activists, and public figures from Pakistan gathered in London for a conference on ‘The Future of Pakistan’ organized under the banner of South Asians Against Terrorism and for Human Rights (SAATH), co-hosted by US-based columnist Dr Mohammad Taqi and former Pakistan ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani.
Filed under: Human rights, Progressive politics | Tagged: Balochistan, fata, Human rights, London Declaration, Pakistan, rule of law | 6 Comments »
Posted on December 19, 2014 by beenasarwar
Pakistan needs to counter not just those who come out on the street in support of Taliban Inc. but also those who support them tacitly.
Thanks to The Huffington Post for inviting me to write this opinion piece, published on Dec. 17, 2014.
By Beena Sarwar
The world looks on with horror at the Pakistani Taliban’s barbaric murder of 145 children and teachers at a school in Peshawar.
Although Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has termed the Peshawar attack a national tragedy, announced three days of national mourning and promised to eradicate the terrorists, real change won’t occur unless Pakistan discards the “good Taliban, bad Taliban” narrative and moves to decisively uphold the rule of law. Continue reading
Filed under: Terrorism | Tagged: 'War on terror', Ahmadis, Church attack, democracy, Pakistan, Pakistan surrender at Dhaka, Peshawar school attack, rule of law, Taliban | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 8, 2014 by beenasarwar
Upd Shama and Shehzad with one of their daughters, in front of a tropical backdrop. How dare they aspire for a better life?
Update: For the first time in Pakistan’s history, the state has become the plaintiff in a case involving murder due to alleged blasphemy. Let this be the start of a new era where no one dare attack or kill anyone on such a pretext again. Let the rule of law prevail, and religion not be used to cover up heinous crimes.
The vicious cycle continues in the “Islamic Republic of Pakistan”. It will not end unless the ‘takfiri’ (declaring someone a non-Muslim) ideology and justifying murder for alleged ‘blasphemy’ are not curbed. Once again a violent mob incited by calls from mosque pulpits has killed on the basis of such allegations. Once again the motive was not ‘religious’ but financial (as often happens). Rule of law MUST be imposed and the culprits caught, charged, tried and punished. Enough of this culture of impunity for crimes committed in the name of religion. This time it was a poor young couple – read Asif Aqeel’s comprehensive account of Shama and Shehzad, brick-kiln workers, lynched after being accused of ‘desecrated’ pages of the Quran (she was pregnant, they leave behind four children including a baby). Fifty people have been arrested. The next day, in another city, a policeman axed to death a man brought into custody after being arrested for a brawl – his justification: the man had been committed “blasphemy”. The policeman has been arrested. Below: Society for Secular Pakistan’s demand that clerics involved in hate speech be arrested and punished for inciting religious feeling.
The cycle will continue because no one is ever punished for either false allegations, or for their involvement in the criminal act of extra-judicial murder, although laws exist against both. The ‘blasphemy’ laws of Pakistan are not divinely ordained. These are man-made laws, imposed on Pakistan by a military dictator. Gen Ziaul Haq added various clauses to the original Article 295 of the British law (shared by India and Bangladesh) that dealt with injuring religious sentiment. While criminalising other aspects of ‘injuring religious sentiment’, the critical words ‘malicious intent’ were quietly dropped. ‘Intent’ or ‘neeyat‘ is crucial when someone is accused of such crimes. If the intent was not to defile or injure religious sentiments, there is no case. It’s time to openly debate these issues and stop this senseless violence. Even if someone burnt some pages of the Quran, that is not grounds to kill them. Continue reading
Filed under: Blasphemy Laws | Tagged: 295-C, blasphemy, brick kiln workers, hate speech, mob violence, Pakistan, rule of law, Shama Shahzad, Society for Secular Pakistan | 3 Comments »
Posted on October 29, 2014 by beenasarwar
Manoj Mitta speaking at MIT. Credit: Beena Sarwar
– As senior Indian journalist Manoj Mitta was testifying before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the U.S. Congress last month about mass violence and impunity in India, President Barack Obama escorted India’s newly elected Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the Martin Luther King Memorial.
“They were just three miles away,” Mitta told IPS, commenting on the irony of this coincidence, remembering that the United States had banned Modi’s entry on the mass violence on his watch in 2002 leading to the killing of about 1,000 Muslims in Gujarat state. Continue reading
Filed under: Gujarat 2002, Human rights | Tagged: 1984 Sikh carnage, 2002 Gujarat, Human rights, impunity, inquiry commission, Kultar's Mime, Manoj Mitta, Modi, rule of law | 1 Comment »
Posted on June 7, 2014 by beenasarwar
Iqbal holds up a picture of his wife, Farzana Parveen, killed outside the Lahore High Court. Photo: Aamir Qureshi/AFP/Getty Images
On the murder of Farzana Parveen in Pakistan and the two Dalit girls in India – something I wrote last week, published in The News and in The Times of India blog
There is no honour in killing
End the culture of impunity
Last Tuesday, May 27, two crimes that shocked the world took place, one in the morning in Lahore, Pakistan and the other at night in Uttar Pradesh, India. Three young women – two of them just girls, really, were killed in these incidents. A fourth casualty was the unborn child of the five months pregnant woman in Pakistan. Continue reading
Filed under: Gender, Human rights | Tagged: blood money, Dalit, Farzana, gang rape, honor killing, honour killing, impunity, India, Iqbal, Pakistan, Qisas Diyat, rape, rule of law | 1 Comment »
Posted on April 7, 2014 by beenasarwar
Ridha and Ibtihaj: He bravely faces his staggering loss.
My article for The News on Sunday, shared here with additional links, pix, and tweets:
By Beena Sarwar
Death, destruction, disaster are newsworthy for the mainstream media. What happens to the survivors and how they cope in the long-term are not.
Those who orchestrate bomb blasts thrive on media attention. Those affected by their dastardly acts are left to carry on as best as they can, often with inspiring courage and resilience. Continue reading
Filed under: Human rights | Tagged: #Hazaragenocide, #Shiageno, Hazara, law and order, LEJ, Mastung bus blast, Pakistan, rule of law, Shia | 3 Comments »
Posted on January 3, 2012 by beenasarwar
The equation as it should be: Army following policies set by the civilian elected government, not the other way round. (Reuters file photo)
What is ‘Memogate’? The ‘memo’ in question is a letter allegedly written at the behest of Pakistan’s President by the Ambassador to Washington Husain Haqqani, asking USA to prevent a possible military coup in Pakistan after US Navy Seals killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan on May 2, 2011. Haqqani denied the allegations, sent in a letter offering to resign in order to facilitate an impartial inquiry, and returned to Pakistan to clear his name. Instead, he found his resignation letter accepted. The Supreme Court barred his exit from Pakistan. He has been forced for his own safety to confine himself first to the Presidency and then to the Prime Minister House. On Dec 30, 2011, The Supreme Court in response to a petition against the ‘memo’ formed a three-member judicial commission to look into the matter that the media has dubbed as ‘memogate’.
Asma Jahangir, counsel for Husain Haqqani and former Supreme Court Bar Association President, has refused to appear before the commission saying that she does not trust the judiciary. She has said that instead of forming a commission to create or produce new evidence the Supreme Court should have looked into the evidence placed before it to decide whether there was a prima facie case and whether the court could proceed to enforce any fundamental rights by making a binding order. Continue reading
Filed under: Pakistan | Tagged: Abbottabad, article 184, Asma Jahangir, due process, Husain Haqqani, judicial activism, judicial commission, marvi sirmed, memogate, obl commission, obl killed, pakistan constitution, rule of law | 6 Comments »