Fifth installment of Dilip and my weekly email exchange, published in The News on Sunday (still the best weekly English language paper in Pakistan) Political Economy section, Aman ki Asha page, March 21, 2010.


March 18 2010

Dear Beena,

To begin with, my salaams to the memory and spirit of Aziz Siddiqui, whom you mentioned in your last letter. He’s right, of course: is giving up the fight for your beliefs even an option?

The interesting thing about this exercise is that we agree about a lot of things. Which might raise the question, are we the right people to be doing this exercise at all? But that raises another question: why not? Why should voices that tend to agree on some things not be raised and heard?

And maybe that will be my theme for this letter. Meaning: Why has the relationship between our countries come to be defined by people who are fundamentally antagonistic and vengeful? Is it something intrinsic to the very existence of India and Pakistan? But even if it is, does it have to remain so for eternity?

This is hardly to suggest that we magically give up the serious disputes we have. What I’m suggesting is those of us who don’t see red at the very mention of the other country must claim our rightful space on the battleground. We must spell out and vigorously defend our vision of the future for our countries. After all, I don’t want my children to be burdened with this hostility that kills soldiers along our borders every day, even when we are not fighting an all out war. After all, I think we are best served by brave soldiers who are alive to serve.

There’s a reason I mention “battleground” and “defend” and “soldiers” above. I’m laying some early groundwork for something I wonder if we can work towards: a joint memorial, somewhere near the border, to the soldiers who have died on both sides.

Think of it: at least in our early wars, it’s certain that plenty of soldiers on either side grew up as neighbours, maybe even cousins or brothers, in the same village or town; officers were certainly compatriots during their military training. It must have torn at them to have to fight each other.

We in India have war memorials, as I’m sure you in Pakistan do as well, remembering the sacrifices of our fighting men over six decades. What would it do for our countries to have a joint memorial, remembering the sacrifices on both sides over six decades? What would it do to us? To the hostility?

There are precedents for something like this, which maybe I’ll get to in a subsequent letter. For now, what do you think?

Speaking at my alma mater, BITS Pilani, a few months ago, the actor Rahul Bose said this: “I have a dream of a time when we will cheer a Younis Khan sixer as madly as we cheer a Yuvraj Singh one.” I hold to the hope that this idea of a joint memorial is a step towards realizing Rahul’s dream.

yours always,


March 19, 2010

Dear Dilip

Thanks for your salaams to the memory of our beloved, respected Aziz Siddiqui. I feel sad he is not better known in India, just as there are so many other respected and beloved figures on that side about whom we in Pakistan know little or nothing.

I agree that we need to define the relationship between our countries – ‘we’ as in people like you and me, rather than those who are “fundamentally antagonistic and vengeful”. Certainly, even if it has always been that way, now is the time to change that. If sane voices have an equal playing field and reach the people, the call to resolve all issues through dialogue will prevail over those who routinely use aggression to sabotage peace.

I like your suggestion of a joint memorial to soldiers on both sides. But for this to happen, our armies will have to stop seeing each other as the ‘enemy’.

The idea reminds me of an earlier proposal that you may know about – a joint memorial on Wagah border to “all victims of Partition violence”. Expatriate Pakistanis and Indians initiated this move through Asiapeace and its associated Association for Communal Harmony in Asia (ACHA). They even presented a petition to then Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in August 2004, in the hope that “this memorial will also serve as a symbol of the ending of the armed conflicts and hostilities of the past, and of the beginning of a new era of cooperation, peace, and friendship between the great people of the two countries”. The full text is online at

The website includes the rationale behind the demand. An extract: “It is our sincere wish and hope that this Memorial will help begin a new chapter in the history of the Subcontinent – one based on a better understanding of the past and on mutual trust and respect in the future” (the author is the respected academic and analyst Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed).

ACHA has been observing India-Pakistan Peace Days on August 14 and 15 in different cities around the world for some years now. In 2008, having failed to persuade the governments of India and Pakistan to build this memorial, they set up a virtual memorial where people can contribute names and information. There is a particularly moving comment from Kanta Luthra whose father, then registrar of Punjab University, was stabbed to death in Lahore: “Even after losing everything in the riots, I haven’t forgotten my father’s teaching, “Love people for what they are, not for their religious beliefs”.

p.s. I admire Rahul Bose greatly, but his dream that Indians and Pakistanis will one day cheer each other’s cricket heroes equally goes against the essentially competitive nature of sports. I don’t know of any two countries where people cheer the other team as loudly as their own. Still, Indians and Pakistanis do often cheer for each other against a third party. For now, that’s good enough for me.  🙂

Very best


One Response

  1. Dear Beena,

    It was an article that you wrote a year back for The Hindu that I stumbled upon today and got to your website. It is overwhelming to read your blogs. I am a student pursuing MA International Relations at King’s College London and I just got done yesterday with an informal conference in London between delegates of Pakistan and India including Gen. Aziz Khan and Gen. Jehangir Karamat from the Pakistani side.

    It pained me to see the way arguments engulfed every fragment of that dialogue. Kashmir was followed by baluchistan, Indus Water, Hafiz Saeed… the list has just been growing over the years… in the sporadic tea and food breaks the Indian delegates got together to rebuke the Pakistanis in silent corners of the room and the one amongst the two generals told me ‘Beta, when we goto a dialogue with India, we are provided with a checklist of issues and strict instructions that on every issue we have to argue and not concede… we are trained to only argue and same is the case with the Indian side…’…. I feel desperate and disillusioned at the state of affairs Beena and I request you to guide me on how could I contribute to this by being a student residing in the UK.

    I will await your response.
    Best Regards,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: